Tuesday, October 7, 2025

High-Profile Crypto Project Cipher Collapses, Promises Refund Amid Controversy

Reading Time: 2 minutes

Key Insights:

  • Cipher’s abrupt collapse highlights risks in crypto investments, even with influencer endorsement.
  • Adam Cochran faces scrutiny and trust issues after the promoted Cipher project fails within weeks.
  • Despite high operational costs and quick downfall, Cipher pledges investor reimbursement, sparking industry debate.

Prominent crypto project Cipher faces backlash after its sudden failure just weeks following a high-energy promotion by Key Opinion Leader (KOL) Adam Cochran. Investors were left grappling with unexpected losses, triggering a fierce online debate regarding the project’s legitimacy and sustainability.

Adam Cochran, known for his influential presence in the crypto space, had advocated for Cipher, only to find the project unsustainable due to excessive operational costs. Initially presented as an investment, the project faced stern criticism from commentators, including the notable analyst ZachXBT, who labeled it a “Ponzi fork project.”

Cipher’s downfall began after admitting to severe financial and structural hurdles, notably the lack of genuine users and overwhelming reliance on bots. The team disclosed operating costs of $35,000 per month while earning significantly through the Cipher fee contract, pointing to deeper management issues.

Also Read: Atomic Wallet and Crypto Exchanges Freeze $2M in Suspicious Funds Following Hack

Adam Cochran Opens Up on Cipher Debacle

In a series of charged exchanges on social media, Cochran defended his stance, expressing frustration with the team’s decision and citing personal losses incurred through platform fees. “Something failing isn’t a rug,” he argued, emphasizing the distinction between project failure and fraudulent schemes. He revealed the team’s exorbitant monthly expenses and efforts to mitigate costs, all while exploring avenues for a “graceful exit.”

However, ZachXBT challenged Cochran’s explanations, questioning the rapid downfall of Cipher and highlighting the financial damage to investors lured by Cochran’s promotional activities. 

“How can it be ‘failing’ when it was literally only around for a few days/weeks?” 

ZachXBT contested, implying premature capitulation possibly driven by insufficient profits from the “garbage fork.”

Responding to accusations of a grift, Cochran denied any deceptive intent, referencing a potential grant that exceeded the project’s Total Value Locked (TVL). He reiterated his substantial investment and consequential losses, stressing the inherent risks of early-stage projects.

Despite the controversy, Cipher’s commitment to returning the remaining investments provides solace to disillusioned investors. Nevertheless, the incident underscores the volatile nature of the crypto industry, where high-stake investments can lead to significant gains or staggering losses.

Also Read: Blockchain Security Firm ‘Cyvers’ Disclose CoinW Hack of $13M

The Cipher debacle is a cautionary tale, highlighting the need for thorough due diligence and skepticism towards projects with unclear operational stability, even when endorsed by industry giants. As the dust settles, the crypto community is left wondering who to trust in the fast-paced, high-risk blockchain frontier.

- Advertisement -spot_img

More articles

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

- Advertisement -spot_img

Latest article